Das Thema wird immer wieder oft diskutiert. Die größte Angst wo die meisten haben, ist das Ihnen die Ölpumpe mit der Zeit verreckt. Das alles ist natürlich kein Thema wenn man ein "Dry-Sump" System verwendet. Leider hat das der S2000 nicht.
Hier noch ein Beitrag aus diesem Link
Wie schon gesagt, am liebsten wäre mir die ASM/Toda Kombi ohne das Kurbelwellenrad
As a former design engineer for crankshaft dampers I just wanted to point out a couple important items.The crankshaft damper has nothing to do with engine balance and vibrations. Motion and oscillation of the powertrain, as an assembly, is addressed by your engine mounts, transmission mounts, and potentially roll restrictors.The purpose of a crankshaft damper is to reduce the angular twist / deflection of the crankshaft. Combustion creates pressure. Pressure becomes load into the connecting rod which creates torque on the crankshaft. That torque creates deflection of the shaft as it's not infinitely stiff. Depending on the material, journal offset, length of the shaft, and loads created in the cylinders you can see several degrees of angular deflection in the crankshaft. I've seen an OEM crankshaft which displayed 7° of deflection without a damper. With the damper it was under 2°.The mass of the crank damper and the stiffness of the spring element (the rubber part) are vital to the effectiveness of the damper. They control the resonant frequency of the damper and impact the effective damping. If you change the mass or change the spring stiffness you change the frequency at which it operates. If you don't have enough mass, even at the correct frequency, you don't provide sufficient damping. An incorrectly tuned damper could actually make things worse.
@UncleHo
Eine leichtere Schwungscheibe würde doch mehr bringen als die Alu-Pulleys.
Nochwas zum Gewicht des Fluidampr im Vergleich zum OEM:
The second advantage in favor of the Fluidampr performance damper is the concept of rotating weight. While the overall weight is 5.8lbs, because the inner inertia ring is not bonded and freely rotates, its weight is not fully felt by the crankshaft once the engine is operating. It can be calculated that the rotating weight of a viscous damper is roughly 2/3 its overall weight. Meaning at rpm, the rotational weight spinning in unison with the crankshaft feels more like 3.8lbs. That, plus broad range damping, gave it the edge over the stock tuned elastomer damper.
Demnach würde sich der Fluidampr eher wie ein ca. 1,7 Kg Kurbelwellenrad verhalten/anfühlen. Naja wenn das Teil da ist und eingebaut, werde ich den Unterschied hoffentlich spüren 
. Habe meinen Beitrag aktualisiert.
betrifft die von Toda nicht da genau die Zwei Rollen nicht im Set dabei sind. Daher auch meine Frage zu den verbauten Lagern.
. Honda hat bestimmt nicht ohne Grund ein schwingungsdämpfendes Kurbelwellenrad verbaut.
.
